<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Heads up, the next Firefox platform version is 1.9.2.6 instead of 1.9.2.5</title>
	<atom:link href="http://christian.legnitto.com/blog/2010/06/09/heads-up-the-next-firefox-platform-version-is-1-9-2-6-instead-of-1-9-2-5/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://christian.legnitto.com/blog/2010/06/09/heads-up-the-next-firefox-platform-version-is-1-9-2-6-instead-of-1-9-2-5/</link>
	<description>Christian Legnitto&#039;s blog about Mozilla, Apple, technology, and random stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 22:08:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian</title>
		<link>http://christian.legnitto.com/blog/2010/06/09/heads-up-the-next-firefox-platform-version-is-1-9-2-6-instead-of-1-9-2-5/comment-page-1/#comment-160</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2010 07:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christian.legnitto.com/blog/?p=61#comment-160</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll post it to planning as well. Still getting a handle on the proper communication channels</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll post it to planning as well. Still getting a handle on the proper communication channels</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian</title>
		<link>http://christian.legnitto.com/blog/2010/06/09/heads-up-the-next-firefox-platform-version-is-1-9-2-6-instead-of-1-9-2-5/comment-page-1/#comment-159</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2010 07:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christian.legnitto.com/blog/?p=61#comment-159</guid>
		<description>Yep. Unless the approval is an explicit approval for the Fennec relbranch from the Fennec team, the proper place to land is Mozilla-1.9.2 default.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep. Unless the approval is an explicit approval for the Fennec relbranch from the Fennec team, the proper place to land is Mozilla-1.9.2 default.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boris</title>
		<link>http://christian.legnitto.com/blog/2010/06/09/heads-up-the-next-firefox-platform-version-is-1-9-2-6-instead-of-1-9-2-5/comment-page-1/#comment-158</link>
		<dc:creator>Boris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2010 02:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christian.legnitto.com/blog/?p=61#comment-158</guid>
		<description>So just to make sure I understand.... If I have a patch with approval1.9.2.5 I should land it on 1.9.2 default branch.  If I have a patch with approval1.9.2.6 then I _also_ land it on 1.9.2 default branch?

By the way, I found about this totally by accident today; it might be a good idea to post about this to the .planning newsgroup or something....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So just to make sure I understand&#8230;. If I have a patch with approval1.9.2.5 I should land it on 1.9.2 default branch.  If I have a patch with approval1.9.2.6 then I _also_ land it on 1.9.2 default branch?</p>
<p>By the way, I found about this totally by accident today; it might be a good idea to post about this to the .planning newsgroup or something&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian</title>
		<link>http://christian.legnitto.com/blog/2010/06/09/heads-up-the-next-firefox-platform-version-is-1-9-2-6-instead-of-1-9-2-5/comment-page-1/#comment-119</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 04:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christian.legnitto.com/blog/?p=61#comment-119</guid>
		<description>Yeah, though I believe we skipped 3.6.1 and no one really noticed (http://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/876094-firefox-361362-whats-going-on/). It may be worthwhile to add a note to the release notes, I&#039;ll think about doing that. There is also a possibility of us finding an unexpected issue with 3.6.4 and having to do a quick turn-around update. If that&#039;s the case we&#039;ll call that version 3.6.5 (even though it is based on 1.9.2.4) and there will be no skip. I don&#039;t intend on that happening, but anything can happen when you ship a large change like this to millions of people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, though I believe we skipped 3.6.1 and no one really noticed (<a href="http://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/876094-firefox-361362-whats-going-on/" rel="nofollow">http://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/876094-firefox-361362-whats-going-on/</a>). It may be worthwhile to add a note to the release notes, I&#8217;ll think about doing that. There is also a possibility of us finding an unexpected issue with 3.6.4 and having to do a quick turn-around update. If that&#8217;s the case we&#8217;ll call that version 3.6.5 (even though it is based on 1.9.2.4) and there will be no skip. I don&#8217;t intend on that happening, but anything can happen when you ship a large change like this to millions of people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://christian.legnitto.com/blog/2010/06/09/heads-up-the-next-firefox-platform-version-is-1-9-2-6-instead-of-1-9-2-5/comment-page-1/#comment-110</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 21:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christian.legnitto.com/blog/?p=61#comment-110</guid>
		<description>Cue a thousand &quot;what happened to 3.6.5?&quot; questions on release day. Maybe add a brief note to the page that comes up after updating?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cue a thousand &#8220;what happened to 3.6.5?&#8221; questions on release day. Maybe add a brief note to the page that comes up after updating?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

